By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Grand Rapids PostGrand Rapids PostGrand Rapids Post
  • Local News
  • Crime and Safety
  • State News
  • U.S. News
  • Community
Reading: Appeals Court Rules Evidence Against Man Charged in 1981 Disappearance of Deanie Peters Is Inadmissible
Share
Font ResizerAa
Grand Rapids PostGrand Rapids Post
Font ResizerAa
  • Local News
  • Crime and Safety
  • State News
  • U.S. News
  • Community
Follow US
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Grand Rapids Post > Blog > Community > Appeals Court Rules Evidence Against Man Charged in 1981 Disappearance of Deanie Peters Is Inadmissible
Community

Appeals Court Rules Evidence Against Man Charged in 1981 Disappearance of Deanie Peters Is Inadmissible

Jamie Torres
Last updated: May 26, 2025 6:36 am
Jamie Torres 5 days ago
Share
SHARE

Grand Rapids, Mich. — James Frisbie, the only person charged in connection with the 1981 disappearance of 14-year-old Deanie Peters, secured a significant victory this week when a Michigan appeals court ruled that key evidence used to charge him with perjury was improperly obtained.

The 12-page ruling, issued by a divided Court of Appeals, found that the search and seizure of Frisbie’s cellphone violated legal standards. The majority opinion also criticized the prosecution’s decision to pursue the case under the assumption that Peters was murdered, stating that there was insufficient evidence to support that claim.

Peters vanished in February 1981 after leaving her brother’s wrestling practice at Forest Hills Central Middle School to use the bathroom. Her remains have never been recovered, and a presumptive death certificate is the only formal recognition of her passing.

“However, the disappearance of a teenager does not automatically equate with an allegation that they were murdered,” Justices Noah P. Hood and Kathleen A. Feeney wrote in their majority opinion. They emphasized that without concrete evidence of Peters’s death, the perjury charge, which carries enhanced penalties, should not move forward.

Frisbie was charged with perjury in 2021 following his testimony under an investigative subpoena regarding Peters’s disappearance. The case has remained on hold while Frisbie’s legal team contested the admissibility of evidence obtained from his cellphone.

In dissent, Judge Mark T. Boonstra argued that the initial seizure of the phone was lawful, as Frisbie had consented to the search, and that sufficient evidence existed to support the perjury charge.

The case will now return to Kent County Circuit Court for further proceedings consistent with the appeals court’s ruling. Frisbie remains free on bond, and the perjury charge carries a possible sentence of up to life in prison.

You Might Also Like

Kalamazoo Nonprofit Faces Major Setback After HVAC Unit Stolen

Clergy in Grand Rapids Respond to Mistrial of Officer in Patrick Lyoya Case, Call for Justice and Reform

Jury Deliberates in the Murder Trial of Former Grand Rapids Officer Christopher Schurr

Justice Department Sues States Over Climate Action, Challenging State-Level Efforts to Hold Fossil Fuel Companies Accountable

Gull Lake Community Schools Closed Thursday Due to Threat of Violence

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Previous Article Michigan’s Largest Insurers Report Massive Losses Amid Soaring Drug Costs
Next Article Battle Creek’s Oak Hill Cemetery Closed Indefinitely Following Severe Storm Damage
Grand Rapids PostGrand Rapids Post
© Rights Reserved.
Join Us!

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..

[mc4wp_form]
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?